<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee Challenges Duplicate Capital Gains Entry for Property Sale in Income Tax System.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66002</link>
    <description>Capital gains - treating information contained in ITS as related to transaction of sale of immovable property - Assessee had pointed out how the two transactions reflected in the ITS pertained to one transaction of purchase of immoveable property, pointing out the same registration no. mentioned against the two transactions in the ITS and also pointing out that based on the stamp duty paid by the assessee on the property purchased ,the value of the second transaction reflected the stamp duty value of the said transaction and hence the two transactions were nothing but one transaction reflected twice in the ITS. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:20:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:20:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee Challenges Duplicate Capital Gains Entry for Property Sale in Income Tax System.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66002</link>
      <description>Capital gains - treating information contained in ITS as related to transaction of sale of immovable property - Assessee had pointed out how the two transactions reflected in the ITS pertained to one transaction of purchase of immoveable property, pointing out the same registration no. mentioned against the two transactions in the ITS and also pointing out that based on the stamp duty paid by the assessee on the property purchased ,the value of the second transaction reflected the stamp duty value of the said transaction and hence the two transactions were nothing but one transaction reflected twice in the ITS. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:20:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>