<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty Denied: Section 271(1)(c) Embezzlement Loss Claim Justified; Cheque Absence Doesn&#039;t Invalidate Assessee&#039;s Explanation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66001</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - denial of claim of embezzlement loss - The fact that the cheque does not figure in the bank account of other party does not by itself prove the explanation of the assessee as wrong, as long as cheque stands reflected as issued in the bank statement of the assessee, which was not proved to be false by the Revenue. - No penalty - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:19:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:19:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty Denied: Section 271(1)(c) Embezzlement Loss Claim Justified; Cheque Absence Doesn&#039;t Invalidate Assessee&#039;s Explanation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66001</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - denial of claim of embezzlement loss - The fact that the cheque does not figure in the bank account of other party does not by itself prove the explanation of the assessee as wrong, as long as cheque stands reflected as issued in the bank statement of the assessee, which was not proved to be false by the Revenue. - No penalty - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:19:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=66001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>