<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 345 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428787</link>
    <description>Section 263 revision is not sustainable where the Assessing Officer has made inquiry, considered the assessee&#039;s explanation on TDS disallowance for rent and technical service payments, and adopted one of the permissible views. The record showed application of mind, including verification of the claim that the payee had accounted for the income and furnished the required accountant&#039;s certificate. In such circumstances, the assessment order is not both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue, and revisional interference cannot rest only on a different view taken by the Commissioner. The revisionary order was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:19:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 345 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428787</link>
      <description>Section 263 revision is not sustainable where the Assessing Officer has made inquiry, considered the assessee&#039;s explanation on TDS disallowance for rent and technical service payments, and adopted one of the permissible views. The record showed application of mind, including verification of the claim that the payee had accounted for the income and furnished the required accountant&#039;s certificate. In such circumstances, the assessment order is not both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue, and revisional interference cannot rest only on a different view taken by the Commissioner. The revisionary order was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>