<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 321 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428763</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand under Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, along with interest and penalty, as the appellant had fully complied with the obligations under Rule 6 by reversing the availed Cenvat credit. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of compliance with Cenvat credit rules and ruled in favor of the appellant, providing consequential relief and highlighting the consequences of non-fulfillment of obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:18:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 321 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428763</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand under Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, along with interest and penalty, as the appellant had fully complied with the obligations under Rule 6 by reversing the availed Cenvat credit. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of compliance with Cenvat credit rules and ruled in favor of the appellant, providing consequential relief and highlighting the consequences of non-fulfillment of obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>