<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1368 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304612</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Surat ruled in favor of the Assessee in a case concerning the addition of income from unsold shops as house property income. The Tribunal held that income from stock-in-trade, including unsold shops, should be classified as business income, not house property income. This decision aligned with established case law principles, leading to the allowance of the Assessee&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2022 20:58:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1368 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304612</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Surat ruled in favor of the Assessee in a case concerning the addition of income from unsold shops as house property income. The Tribunal held that income from stock-in-trade, including unsold shops, should be classified as business income, not house property income. This decision aligned with established case law principles, leading to the allowance of the Assessee&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>