<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 56 - HIGH COURT PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30635</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal to partially waive the pre-deposit of Service Tax and penalties for a petitioner Club. The Tribunal&#039;s discretion under the proviso to section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was deemed appropriate, considering the revenue&#039;s interest and the petitioner&#039;s circumstances. The Court emphasized the Tribunal&#039;s authority to assess prima facie case and balance of convenience, affirming that intervention through writ jurisdiction was unnecessary once the Tribunal had considered all relevant factors. The petition to quash the Tribunal&#039;s order was dismissed, reinforcing the importance of such considerations in waiver applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 56 - HIGH COURT PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30635</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal to partially waive the pre-deposit of Service Tax and penalties for a petitioner Club. The Tribunal&#039;s discretion under the proviso to section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was deemed appropriate, considering the revenue&#039;s interest and the petitioner&#039;s circumstances. The Court emphasized the Tribunal&#039;s authority to assess prima facie case and balance of convenience, affirming that intervention through writ jurisdiction was unnecessary once the Tribunal had considered all relevant factors. The petition to quash the Tribunal&#039;s order was dismissed, reinforcing the importance of such considerations in waiver applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>