https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304604 An order cancelling bail could not stand because it was founded on a factual mistake: the criminal antecedent and conviction relied on belonged to a co-accused, not the applicant, so the matter was remitted for fresh consideration. In the murder case, bail granted by the High Court was unsustainable because direct eyewitness attribution, the specific role alleged against the accused, and the seriousness of the charge outweighed vague reliance on investigation delay or an unsubstantiated ailment. The bail order was set aside on merits, and the accused did not secure release. en-us Fri, 10 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Oct 2022 12:04:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304604 An order cancelling bail could not stand because it was founded on a factual mistake: the criminal antecedent and conviction relied on belonged to a co-accused, not the applicant, so the matter was remitted for fresh consideration. In the murder case, bail granted by the High Court was unsustainable because direct eyewitness attribution, the specific role alleged against the accused, and the seriousness of the charge outweighed vague reliance on investigation delay or an unsubstantiated ailment. The bail order was set aside on merits, and the accused did not secure release. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304604