<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 305 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428747</link>
    <description>Recoveries by an employer from employees for canteen and bus transportation facilities arranged through third-party service providers were held outside the scope of taxable supply. The ruling found that the employer was not itself supplying catering or transport services; it merely collected the employees&#039; share and remitted the consolidated amounts to the third-party vendors. Because these recoveries were treated as welfare or employment-related arrangements, and not activities in the course or furtherance of business, they did not constitute consideration for an independent supply. GST was therefore not leviable on the employees&#039; portion recovered for either facility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 305 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428747</link>
      <description>Recoveries by an employer from employees for canteen and bus transportation facilities arranged through third-party service providers were held outside the scope of taxable supply. The ruling found that the employer was not itself supplying catering or transport services; it merely collected the employees&#039; share and remitted the consolidated amounts to the third-party vendors. Because these recoveries were treated as welfare or employment-related arrangements, and not activities in the course or furtherance of business, they did not constitute consideration for an independent supply. GST was therefore not leviable on the employees&#039; portion recovered for either facility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>