https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304601 Identification evidence was rejected as unreliable where the sole eyewitness admitted seeing the accused in police lock-up before the test identification parade, and no other cogent evidence linked them to the offence under Sections 396 and 397 IPC. In those circumstances, the trial court's view that the prosecution had not proved its case was a reasonable and possible view, and appellate interference with the acquittal was unwarranted. The acquittal therefore stood because a conviction cannot rest on tainted identification evidence unsupported by other trustworthy proof. en-us Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 09 Oct 2022 20:29:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304601 Identification evidence was rejected as unreliable where the sole eyewitness admitted seeing the accused in police lock-up before the test identification parade, and no other cogent evidence linked them to the offence under Sections 396 and 397 IPC. In those circumstances, the trial court's view that the prosecution had not proved its case was a reasonable and possible view, and appellate interference with the acquittal was unwarranted. The acquittal therefore stood because a conviction cannot rest on tainted identification evidence unsupported by other trustworthy proof. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304601