https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304598 The revision petition was allowed, setting aside the judgments of the lower courts. The accused was acquitted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The amounts deposited by the accused were ordered to be refunded with accrued interest, and the bail bonds were canceled. The court found that a complaint filed by a Director without proper authorization did not meet the requirements of Section 142(a) of the Act, leading to the inability to convict the accused based on such a complaint. en-us Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Oct 2022 15:15:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304598 The revision petition was allowed, setting aside the judgments of the lower courts. The accused was acquitted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The amounts deposited by the accused were ordered to be refunded with accrued interest, and the bail bonds were canceled. The court found that a complaint filed by a Director without proper authorization did not meet the requirements of Section 142(a) of the Act, leading to the inability to convict the accused based on such a complaint. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304598