https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304597 The court dismissed the appeals as the complainant failed to establish proper authority for the individuals who filed the complaints. It was found that the complaints were not filed by properly authorized persons, as the authority letters issued were not supported by resolutions passed by the board of directors. The court held that the Managing Director did not have the authority to file criminal complaints, leading to the conclusion that the complaints were not maintainable due to the lack of proper authorization. en-us Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Oct 2022 15:05:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304597 The court dismissed the appeals as the complainant failed to establish proper authority for the individuals who filed the complaints. It was found that the complaints were not filed by properly authorized persons, as the authority letters issued were not supported by resolutions passed by the board of directors. The court held that the Managing Director did not have the authority to file criminal complaints, leading to the conclusion that the complaints were not maintainable due to the lack of proper authorization. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304597