<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 274 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30626</link>
    <description>The appeal involving the condonation of a delay in filing and reduction of penalty under Sections 76 and 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 was disposed of despite a 20-day delay. The Commissioner (Appeals) had reduced the penalty, citing precedents and discretion under Section 80. The Tribunal emphasized judicial discipline in following High Court orders and upheld the reduction of penalties based on reasonable causes. The decision underscored the importance of adhering to legal provisions and court precedents in determining penalty reductions under the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 274 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30626</link>
      <description>The appeal involving the condonation of a delay in filing and reduction of penalty under Sections 76 and 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 was disposed of despite a 20-day delay. The Commissioner (Appeals) had reduced the penalty, citing precedents and discretion under Section 80. The Tribunal emphasized judicial discipline in following High Court orders and upheld the reduction of penalties based on reasonable causes. The decision underscored the importance of adhering to legal provisions and court precedents in determining penalty reductions under the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>