https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428706 The Court quashed the impugned orders and directed respondent no.3 to conduct a denovo hearing, considering the petitioner's submissions on merits and issuing fresh orders accordingly. A timeline of six weeks was set for the disposal of appeals by respondent no.3, emphasizing the requirement for a reasoned order addressing all petitioner submissions and granting a personal hearing with advance notice. The Court stressed the importance of resolving procedural issues surrounding pre-deposit payments promptly and forwarded a copy of the order to the CBI & C for necessary action. en-us Mon, 03 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Mar 2023 18:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428706 The Court quashed the impugned orders and directed respondent no.3 to conduct a denovo hearing, considering the petitioner's submissions on merits and issuing fresh orders accordingly. A timeline of six weeks was set for the disposal of appeals by respondent no.3, emphasizing the requirement for a reasoned order addressing all petitioner submissions and granting a personal hearing with advance notice. The Court stressed the importance of resolving procedural issues surrounding pre-deposit payments promptly and forwarded a copy of the order to the CBI & C for necessary action. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 03 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428706