<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 258 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428700</link>
    <description>The writ petition was considered fit for admission where the petitioner faced substantial penalties under the Customs Act, 1962 and the statutory appeal involved a pre-deposit burden. On that basis, the Court granted interim protection against implementation of the impugned order pending final hearing. The petition was admitted for further hearing, with relief operating to preserve the petitioner&#039;s position until the merits are examined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2022 13:08:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 258 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428700</link>
      <description>The writ petition was considered fit for admission where the petitioner faced substantial penalties under the Customs Act, 1962 and the statutory appeal involved a pre-deposit burden. On that basis, the Court granted interim protection against implementation of the impugned order pending final hearing. The petition was admitted for further hearing, with relief operating to preserve the petitioner&#039;s position until the merits are examined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>