<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 250 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428692</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning the addition of alleged cash consideration made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal found that the statement relied upon lacked corroboration and evidentiary support, emphasizing the importance of documentary evidence to substantiate such additions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2022 07:57:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 250 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428692</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning the addition of alleged cash consideration made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal found that the statement relied upon lacked corroboration and evidentiary support, emphasizing the importance of documentary evidence to substantiate such additions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>