<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1615 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304586</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals and affirming that no substantial question of law arose for consideration. The penalties imposed under Section 271D and 271E for accepting a loan from a director and repayment in cash were deleted. The transactions were deemed to be current account transactions between identifiable parties, not constituting loans under Section 269SS, based on legal precedents and interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2022 17:00:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1615 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304586</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals and affirming that no substantial question of law arose for consideration. The penalties imposed under Section 271D and 271E for accepting a loan from a director and repayment in cash were deleted. The transactions were deemed to be current account transactions between identifiable parties, not constituting loans under Section 269SS, based on legal precedents and interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>