https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30620 The writ petition was dismissed by the court due to the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the petitioner's concealment of material facts regarding an appeal before the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The court imposed exemplary costs of rupees two lacs on the petitioner for misuse of the judicial process, to be divided between the Legal Aid Society of the High Court and the Mediation Center. The court clarified that its decision should not impact the pending appeal before the Tribunal. en-us Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30620 The writ petition was dismissed by the court due to the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the petitioner's concealment of material facts regarding an appeal before the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). The court imposed exemplary costs of rupees two lacs on the petitioner for misuse of the judicial process, to be divided between the Legal Aid Society of the High Court and the Mediation Center. The court clarified that its decision should not impact the pending appeal before the Tribunal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30620