<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 243 - NATIONAL ANTI PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428685</link>
    <description>NAPA held that a construction company contravened Section 171 of CGST Act, 2017 by not passing on ITC benefits to home buyers. The authority found profiteering of Rs. 50,09,158 during July 2017 to October 2019, based on ITC percentage increase from 3.36% (pre-GST) to 4.27% (post-GST) period. The respondent was directed to refund the profiteered amount with 18% interest and faced penalty under Section 171(3A) for denying tax reduction benefits to customers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 15:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 243 - NATIONAL ANTI PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428685</link>
      <description>NAPA held that a construction company contravened Section 171 of CGST Act, 2017 by not passing on ITC benefits to home buyers. The authority found profiteering of Rs. 50,09,158 during July 2017 to October 2019, based on ITC percentage increase from 3.36% (pre-GST) to 4.27% (post-GST) period. The respondent was directed to refund the profiteered amount with 18% interest and faced penalty under Section 171(3A) for denying tax reduction benefits to customers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>