https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428680 The court resolved the matter in favor of the petitioner, an 88-year-old senior citizen, by directing the Bank to lift the attachment order on her fixed deposits. It was established that the fixed deposits solely belonged to the petitioner, supported by tax filings and TDS credits to her PAN. The court found a lack of clarity in the attachment order, noting it was directed at the petitioner's son's bank accounts and not her fixed deposits. As a result, the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing her to encash her fixed deposits without delay. en-us Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Oct 2022 13:11:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428680 The court resolved the matter in favor of the petitioner, an 88-year-old senior citizen, by directing the Bank to lift the attachment order on her fixed deposits. It was established that the fixed deposits solely belonged to the petitioner, supported by tax filings and TDS credits to her PAN. The court found a lack of clarity in the attachment order, noting it was directed at the petitioner's son's bank accounts and not her fixed deposits. As a result, the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing her to encash her fixed deposits without delay. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428680