<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 222 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428664</link>
    <description>Income from technical and ground handling services provided to other airlines in India was treated as covered by Article 8(1) read with Article 8(3) of the India-Netherlands DTAA, following earlier decisions in the assessee&#039;s own case and the consistent view of the jurisdictional High Court and Tribunal. In the absence of any material factual distinction, the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition was not justified, and the treaty exemption claim was accepted with the addition deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 20:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 222 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428664</link>
      <description>Income from technical and ground handling services provided to other airlines in India was treated as covered by Article 8(1) read with Article 8(3) of the India-Netherlands DTAA, following earlier decisions in the assessee&#039;s own case and the consistent view of the jurisdictional High Court and Tribunal. In the absence of any material factual distinction, the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition was not justified, and the treaty exemption claim was accepted with the addition deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>