<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 219 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428661</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decisions on various issues including royalty, corporate guarantee charges, loan to AE, receivables, deductions under sections 80IB and 80IC, PF, ESI &amp;amp; EPS contributions, and notional expenditure on exempted income. The ITAT also allowed additional claims by the assessee for excise duty refund and stock option scheme expenses, remanding them for adjudication. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing consistency with previous rulings and judicial discipline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 219 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428661</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decisions on various issues including royalty, corporate guarantee charges, loan to AE, receivables, deductions under sections 80IB and 80IC, PF, ESI &amp;amp; EPS contributions, and notional expenditure on exempted income. The ITAT also allowed additional claims by the assessee for excise duty refund and stock option scheme expenses, remanding them for adjudication. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing consistency with previous rulings and judicial discipline.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>