<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 217 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428659</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 9,00,90,000, as it found the share valuation using the DCF method to be substantiated and in accordance with accounting principles. The Tribunal emphasized the need for concrete evidence when rejecting valuations, ultimately allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and highlighting the importance of credible valuation methods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2022 13:10:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 217 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428659</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 9,00,90,000, as it found the share valuation using the DCF method to be substantiated and in accordance with accounting principles. The Tribunal emphasized the need for concrete evidence when rejecting valuations, ultimately allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and highlighting the importance of credible valuation methods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>