<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 212 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428654</link>
    <description>The court quashed the Settlement Commission&#039;s orders imposing interest and penalties on the petitioner, directing the refund of the penalty amount and cancellation of the bank guarantee. Emphasizing that interest and penalties require explicit statutory provisions, the court ruled the imposition unwarranted. The petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2022 13:10:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 212 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428654</link>
      <description>The court quashed the Settlement Commission&#039;s orders imposing interest and penalties on the petitioner, directing the refund of the penalty amount and cancellation of the bank guarantee. Emphasizing that interest and penalties require explicit statutory provisions, the court ruled the imposition unwarranted. The petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>