<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 202 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOCHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428644</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by Debenture holders against the Resolution Professional and Authorised Representative, directing parties to address grievances through SEBI or its appellate authority. The decision was based on the Tribunal&#039;s analysis of the situation, adherence to IBC provisions, practical challenges, and the involvement of a large number of NCD holders. The Tribunal found no merit in the Debenture holders&#039; contentions regarding lack of communication, unilateral actions, conduct of COC meetings, and concerns over transactions, ultimately emphasizing the need to avoid further delays in ongoing legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2022 13:09:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 202 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOCHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428644</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by Debenture holders against the Resolution Professional and Authorised Representative, directing parties to address grievances through SEBI or its appellate authority. The decision was based on the Tribunal&#039;s analysis of the situation, adherence to IBC provisions, practical challenges, and the involvement of a large number of NCD holders. The Tribunal found no merit in the Debenture holders&#039; contentions regarding lack of communication, unilateral actions, conduct of COC meetings, and concerns over transactions, ultimately emphasizing the need to avoid further delays in ongoing legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>