<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 197 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428639</link>
    <description>The court denied the applicant&#039;s request for anticipatory bail, citing reasonable grounds to believe in the applicant&#039;s involvement in the alleged money laundering offense and the likelihood of committing further offenses if granted bail. The court highlighted the seriousness of economic offenses and the relevance of Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 in such bail applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2022 13:09:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 197 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428639</link>
      <description>The court denied the applicant&#039;s request for anticipatory bail, citing reasonable grounds to believe in the applicant&#039;s involvement in the alleged money laundering offense and the likelihood of committing further offenses if granted bail. The court highlighted the seriousness of economic offenses and the relevance of Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 in such bail applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>