<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1661 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304569</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the software development company, holding that the proviso to section 40(a)(ia) had retrospective effect from 01.04.2005. The decision emphasized that as long as the deductee paid taxes on the income subject to TDS, no disallowance should occur under section 40(a)(ia). This outcome aimed to ensure the taxation of the entire income and prevent unnecessary disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 23:18:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1661 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304569</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the software development company, holding that the proviso to section 40(a)(ia) had retrospective effect from 01.04.2005. The decision emphasized that as long as the deductee paid taxes on the income subject to TDS, no disallowance should occur under section 40(a)(ia). This outcome aimed to ensure the taxation of the entire income and prevent unnecessary disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>