<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1978 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304577</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus for acceptance of Form C and issuance of Form E-1, and grant of concessional tax rate. The court noted that the petitioner&#039;s claims were contractual in nature and could be pursued through other legal avenues, not under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court emphasized that a writ petition was not the appropriate remedy, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 23:18:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1978 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304577</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus for acceptance of Form C and issuance of Form E-1, and grant of concessional tax rate. The court noted that the petitioner&#039;s claims were contractual in nature and could be pursued through other legal avenues, not under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court emphasized that a writ petition was not the appropriate remedy, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>