<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 185 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428627</link>
    <description>Interference under Article 226 was declined where the appellate order was a speaking order and no breach of natural justice or contravention of law was shown. The challenge was based on factual and evidence-driven objections, which the writ court could not reappreciate or treat as an appeal over the authority&#039;s findings. On that basis, constitutional writ intervention was held unwarranted and the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 185 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428627</link>
      <description>Interference under Article 226 was declined where the appellate order was a speaking order and no breach of natural justice or contravention of law was shown. The challenge was based on factual and evidence-driven objections, which the writ court could not reappreciate or treat as an appeal over the authority&#039;s findings. On that basis, constitutional writ intervention was held unwarranted and the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>