<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 273 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30610</link>
    <description>The tribunal directed the appellant to make a specific pre-deposit within a stipulated time frame, considering their financial difficulties. Failure to comply would result in dismissal of the appeal. The appellant contested various demands, arguing technical discrepancies should not deny credit. The tribunal considered both sides&#039; arguments and listed the matter for a final hearing contingent on compliance with the pre-deposit order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 273 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30610</link>
      <description>The tribunal directed the appellant to make a specific pre-deposit within a stipulated time frame, considering their financial difficulties. Failure to comply would result in dismissal of the appeal. The appellant contested various demands, arguing technical discrepancies should not deny credit. The tribunal considered both sides&#039; arguments and listed the matter for a final hearing contingent on compliance with the pre-deposit order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>