https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30605 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand for the extended period, ruling that duty could only be demanded for up to six months. Consequently, the penalty under Section 11AC was deemed unnecessary, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. The decision emphasized the genuineness of the assessee's belief regarding SSI benefit eligibility and the absence of intentional suppression of facts, highlighting the significance of bona fide belief in determining liability and duty demands. en-us Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30605 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand for the extended period, ruling that duty could only be demanded for up to six months. Consequently, the penalty under Section 11AC was deemed unnecessary, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. The decision emphasized the genuineness of the assessee's belief regarding SSI benefit eligibility and the absence of intentional suppression of facts, highlighting the significance of bona fide belief in determining liability and duty demands. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30605