<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 137 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428579</link>
    <description>For branch-transfer exemption under the Central Sales Tax Act, non-filing of Form F did not automatically bar consideration of other credible supporting material such as invoices, lorry receipts, stock records and related assessment orders. The Tribunal, as the final fact-finding authority, was required to re-examine the remanded turnover on the basis of the available documents and decide whether the movement of goods was a branch transfer rather than an inter-State sale. The rectification limitation under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act did not foreclose fresh consideration of the remanded turnover, although it could not revive a finally concluded part of the assessment. The appellate order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 16:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 137 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428579</link>
      <description>For branch-transfer exemption under the Central Sales Tax Act, non-filing of Form F did not automatically bar consideration of other credible supporting material such as invoices, lorry receipts, stock records and related assessment orders. The Tribunal, as the final fact-finding authority, was required to re-examine the remanded turnover on the basis of the available documents and decide whether the movement of goods was a branch transfer rather than an inter-State sale. The rectification limitation under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act did not foreclose fresh consideration of the remanded turnover, although it could not revive a finally concluded part of the assessment. The appellate order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>