https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428577 Admission of the cheque and signatures triggered the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, placing the burden on the accused to raise a probable defence on a preponderance of probabilities. The accused's claim that the cheque was only a security cheque and that payment had been made in cash was not proved, so the presumption of legally enforceable liability remained unrebutted and the conviction under Section 138 was sustained. Revisional interference was also unwarranted because the concurrent findings below disclosed no illegality, perversity, or miscarriage of justice. en-us Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Oct 2022 18:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428577 Admission of the cheque and signatures triggered the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, placing the burden on the accused to raise a probable defence on a preponderance of probabilities. The accused's claim that the cheque was only a security cheque and that payment had been made in cash was not proved, so the presumption of legally enforceable liability remained unrebutted and the conviction under Section 138 was sustained. Revisional interference was also unwarranted because the concurrent findings below disclosed no illegality, perversity, or miscarriage of justice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428577