<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2830 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304559</link>
    <description>Indian tax commentary on permanent establishment and royalty issues notes that frequent employee presence, supervision of operations, and a fixed place at the enterprise&#039;s disposal can support a fixed place Permanent Establishment, while the conditions for a dependent agent Permanent Establishment may still fail. It further states that profit attribution to an Indian Permanent Establishment must be made on a functional, fact-based basis, and no additional profit is attributable where the relevant year shows an overall loss over payments to the Indian service provider. Telecommunication link charges are described as non-royalty because the payer does not obtain possession or control of equipment or a right to use it. Interest under section 234B is also treated as leviable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2022 07:57:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2830 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304559</link>
      <description>Indian tax commentary on permanent establishment and royalty issues notes that frequent employee presence, supervision of operations, and a fixed place at the enterprise&#039;s disposal can support a fixed place Permanent Establishment, while the conditions for a dependent agent Permanent Establishment may still fail. It further states that profit attribution to an Indian Permanent Establishment must be made on a functional, fact-based basis, and no additional profit is attributable where the relevant year shows an overall loss over payments to the Indian service provider. Telecommunication link charges are described as non-royalty because the payer does not obtain possession or control of equipment or a right to use it. Interest under section 234B is also treated as leviable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>