https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304567 The Punjab and Haryana HC held that restriction on the right to travel abroad, as part of Article 21 personal liberty, must follow a fair and reasonable procedure. A Look Out Circular cannot be enforced without communicating the LOC and reasons and providing a meaningful post-decisional hearing; secrecy alone does not satisfy natural justice. The Court also noted that an LOC cannot be justified merely because a person is a guarantor for a corporate borrower with loan default, absent any FIR, criminal case, or other exceptional circumstance recognised by the applicable guidelines. Mechanical issuance was treated as arbitrary and unreasonable, and the LOC was quashed. en-us Tue, 05 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Oct 2022 07:57:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304567 The Punjab and Haryana HC held that restriction on the right to travel abroad, as part of Article 21 personal liberty, must follow a fair and reasonable procedure. A Look Out Circular cannot be enforced without communicating the LOC and reasons and providing a meaningful post-decisional hearing; secrecy alone does not satisfy natural justice. The Court also noted that an LOC cannot be justified merely because a person is a guarantor for a corporate borrower with loan default, absent any FIR, criminal case, or other exceptional circumstance recognised by the applicable guidelines. Mechanical issuance was treated as arbitrary and unreasonable, and the LOC was quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304567