<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 234 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30602</link>
    <description>Service tax as a tour operator applied only where tours were operated in a vehicle that legally qualified as a tourist vehicle under the motor vehicle law and met the prescribed statutory specifications. The assessee&#039;s vehicles were described in the permit as stage carriages, and the record did not show compliance with tourist-vehicle requirements, so the tour operator demand and related penalty were set aside. The mandap keeper demand was not disputed and was sustained, but the penalty was reduced to a nominal amount. The issue relating to business auxiliary service was left open for the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 234 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30602</link>
      <description>Service tax as a tour operator applied only where tours were operated in a vehicle that legally qualified as a tourist vehicle under the motor vehicle law and met the prescribed statutory specifications. The assessee&#039;s vehicles were described in the permit as stage carriages, and the record did not show compliance with tourist-vehicle requirements, so the tour operator demand and related penalty were set aside. The mandap keeper demand was not disputed and was sustained, but the penalty was reduced to a nominal amount. The issue relating to business auxiliary service was left open for the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>