<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 134 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428576</link>
    <description>The Orissa HC dismissed a petition challenging the constitutional validity of a circular dated 07.12.2017 regarding GST tax sharing and reimbursement claims. The petitioner sought restitution of benefits with interest and compensation, alleging violation of fundamental rights and infringement of GST Act provisions. The HC held that determining amounts owed between parties involved highly disputed questions of fact regarding GST deductions from bills. The court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226 for case-by-case GST component calculations, directing the petitioner to pursue other appropriate legal remedies. The petition was dismissed without exercising extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 134 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428576</link>
      <description>The Orissa HC dismissed a petition challenging the constitutional validity of a circular dated 07.12.2017 regarding GST tax sharing and reimbursement claims. The petitioner sought restitution of benefits with interest and compensation, alleging violation of fundamental rights and infringement of GST Act provisions. The HC held that determining amounts owed between parties involved highly disputed questions of fact regarding GST deductions from bills. The court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226 for case-by-case GST component calculations, directing the petitioner to pursue other appropriate legal remedies. The petition was dismissed without exercising extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>