<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 103 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428545</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) to delete the addition under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The respondent&#039;s lack of shareholding in the recipient company at the time of the loan was supported by evidence and legal reasoning, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2022 08:51:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 103 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428545</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) to delete the addition under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The respondent&#039;s lack of shareholding in the recipient company at the time of the loan was supported by evidence and legal reasoning, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>