<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 145 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30596</link>
    <description>Capital goods credit could not be denied by directing reversal without prior show cause notice; the Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to notice, reply and a speaking order before any adverse action. It further held that earlier reversal of the credit did not prevent examination of entitlement on merits, and the question of eligibility had to be decided afresh by the adjudicating authority in accordance with natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 145 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30596</link>
      <description>Capital goods credit could not be denied by directing reversal without prior show cause notice; the Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to notice, reply and a speaking order before any adverse action. It further held that earlier reversal of the credit did not prevent examination of entitlement on merits, and the question of eligibility had to be decided afresh by the adjudicating authority in accordance with natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>