https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428539 The court ruled in favor of the Petitioner, determining that the territorial jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court was appropriate to entertain the Writ Petition challenging the suspension of the Petitioner's registration as an Insolvency Professional. The court emphasized that the cause of action, including the impact on the Petitioner's work in Maharashtra, connected the case to the Bombay High Court's jurisdiction. Consequently, the court allowed the challenge against the suspension order to proceed for a full hearing on its merits. en-us Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Oct 2022 20:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428539 The court ruled in favor of the Petitioner, determining that the territorial jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court was appropriate to entertain the Writ Petition challenging the suspension of the Petitioner's registration as an Insolvency Professional. The court emphasized that the cause of action, including the impact on the Petitioner's work in Maharashtra, connected the case to the Bombay High Court's jurisdiction. Consequently, the court allowed the challenge against the suspension order to proceed for a full hearing on its merits. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428539