https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304551 The Delhi HC noted that, in a Section 11 petition, the court's role is limited to verifying the existence of a written arbitration agreement and a prima facie arbitrable dispute. Reading clauses 36 and 37 together, it treated the addendum as preserving both specific enforcement rights in appropriate cases and a separate arbitration mechanism for disputes arising from the agreement. Objections based on limitation, maintainability, and the specific performance clause did not exclude arbitration at the appointment stage, and the issue of whether a third party was necessary was left to the tribunal. Two arbitrators were appointed to constitute the tribunal. en-us Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Oct 2022 16:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304551 The Delhi HC noted that, in a Section 11 petition, the court's role is limited to verifying the existence of a written arbitration agreement and a prima facie arbitrable dispute. Reading clauses 36 and 37 together, it treated the addendum as preserving both specific enforcement rights in appropriate cases and a separate arbitration mechanism for disputes arising from the agreement. Objections based on limitation, maintainability, and the specific performance clause did not exclude arbitration at the appointment stage, and the issue of whether a third party was necessary was left to the tribunal. Two arbitrators were appointed to constitute the tribunal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304551