<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1312 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304557</link>
    <description>A Look Out Circular affecting travel abroad engages the right to personal liberty under Article 21 and must rest on lawful authority, fair procedure, and a prima facie basis within the governing guidelines. The Court found that the petitioner was not shown to be an accused in any criminal case, no FIR had been registered, and no material indicated prejudice to sovereignty, security, integrity, bilateral relations, or India&#039;s economic interests. It also noted that the LOC had not been supplied despite request and that the bank&#039;s request was made mechanically on mere suspicion arising from loan default. On that basis, the LOC was held arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable, and violative of Articles 14 and 21, and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2022 08:50:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1312 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304557</link>
      <description>A Look Out Circular affecting travel abroad engages the right to personal liberty under Article 21 and must rest on lawful authority, fair procedure, and a prima facie basis within the governing guidelines. The Court found that the petitioner was not shown to be an accused in any criminal case, no FIR had been registered, and no material indicated prejudice to sovereignty, security, integrity, bilateral relations, or India&#039;s economic interests. It also noted that the LOC had not been supplied despite request and that the bank&#039;s request was made mechanically on mere suspicion arising from loan default. On that basis, the LOC was held arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable, and violative of Articles 14 and 21, and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>