<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 86 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428528</link>
    <description>HC reviewed bail compliance issues for petitioner who allegedly failed to meet some bail conditions. Despite minor technical lapses in communication with investigating officer, court found violations were not intentional or substantial. HC set aside the impugned order, directing petitioner to continue cooperating with investigation and strictly follow original bail conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 86 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428528</link>
      <description>HC reviewed bail compliance issues for petitioner who allegedly failed to meet some bail conditions. Despite minor technical lapses in communication with investigating officer, court found violations were not intentional or substantial. HC set aside the impugned order, directing petitioner to continue cooperating with investigation and strictly follow original bail conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>