<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 83 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428525</link>
    <description>The court declared the explanations in the notifications dated 31.03.2021 and 27.04.2021 as ultra vires and struck them down. The notice issued under Section 148 for the assessment year 2016-17 was deemed invalid due to non-compliance with mandatory procedures. The Assessing Officer was allowed to initiate fresh reassessment proceedings in accordance with the amended provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2022 08:57:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 83 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428525</link>
      <description>The court declared the explanations in the notifications dated 31.03.2021 and 27.04.2021 as ultra vires and struck them down. The notice issued under Section 148 for the assessment year 2016-17 was deemed invalid due to non-compliance with mandatory procedures. The Assessing Officer was allowed to initiate fresh reassessment proceedings in accordance with the amended provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>