<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 75 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13. It held that the Assessing Officer did not properly satisfy the requirements under Section 14A(2) for the disallowances, leading to the disallowance being deemed incorrect. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to deductions under Section 10B, following its previous rulings in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2022 10:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 75 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13. It held that the Assessing Officer did not properly satisfy the requirements under Section 14A(2) for the disallowances, leading to the disallowance being deemed incorrect. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to deductions under Section 10B, following its previous rulings in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>