<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 227 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30590</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Court found that the assessee successfully proved that the amount in question was deposited by his sons from the sale of pilfered stocks outside the books. The Court emphasized that it could not interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s findings as there was no substantial question of law warranting a different outcome. The appeal was therefore dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 227 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30590</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Court found that the assessee successfully proved that the amount in question was deposited by his sons from the sale of pilfered stocks outside the books. The Court emphasized that it could not interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s findings as there was no substantial question of law warranting a different outcome. The appeal was therefore dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>