<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 59 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428501</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the dropping of certain demands in the impugned order, dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, and remanded specific issues for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the adjudicating authority to consider the submissions and evidence provided by the assessee in accordance with established legal principles. The appeals were disposed of on these terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2022 08:56:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 59 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428501</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the dropping of certain demands in the impugned order, dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, and remanded specific issues for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the adjudicating authority to consider the submissions and evidence provided by the assessee in accordance with established legal principles. The appeals were disposed of on these terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>