<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 53 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428495</link>
    <description>A non-bidder NGO lacking aggrieved-party status could not maintain a writ challenge to tender conditions. Tender terms, including airport clustering, experience requirements, and turnover criteria, fall within the tendering authority&#039;s commercial discretion, and judicial review under Article 226 is limited to cases of arbitrariness, discrimination, mala fides, or bias. The authority&#039;s commercial and operational justification was accepted, so the conditions were not interfered with. The MSME policy and related procurement norms did not invalidate the tender criteria, and the tender conditions were restored with the writ petition rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2022 08:56:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 53 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428495</link>
      <description>A non-bidder NGO lacking aggrieved-party status could not maintain a writ challenge to tender conditions. Tender terms, including airport clustering, experience requirements, and turnover criteria, fall within the tendering authority&#039;s commercial discretion, and judicial review under Article 226 is limited to cases of arbitrariness, discrimination, mala fides, or bias. The authority&#039;s commercial and operational justification was accepted, so the conditions were not interfered with. The MSME policy and related procurement norms did not invalidate the tender criteria, and the tender conditions were restored with the writ petition rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>