https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428495 The Supreme Court held that a non-profit organization lacked standing to challenge tender conditions, ruling it was not an "aggrieved party." The Court emphasized that tender terms are not subject to judicial scrutiny unless arbitrary, discriminatory, or mala fide. The Court found the eligibility criteria reasonable and set aside the High Court's decision, dismissing the writ petition. The Court clarified that MSME orders do not apply to selecting Ground Handling Services providers. The High Court's judgment was quashed, and the appeals were allowed with no costs. en-us Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Oct 2022 08:56:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428495 The Supreme Court held that a non-profit organization lacked standing to challenge tender conditions, ruling it was not an "aggrieved party." The Court emphasized that tender terms are not subject to judicial scrutiny unless arbitrary, discriminatory, or mala fide. The Court found the eligibility criteria reasonable and set aside the High Court's decision, dismissing the writ petition. The Court clarified that MSME orders do not apply to selecting Ground Handling Services providers. The High Court's judgment was quashed, and the appeals were allowed with no costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428495