<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 52 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428494</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal, modifying the interest awarded by the Arbitrator to 9% per annum for specific periods and denying interest for periods of delay caused by the respondent. The judgment emphasized the need for arbitral tribunals to provide reasoned decisions on interest rates and considered the conduct of parties in awarding interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2022 08:56:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=692418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 52 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428494</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal, modifying the interest awarded by the Arbitrator to 9% per annum for specific periods and denying interest for periods of delay caused by the respondent. The judgment emphasized the need for arbitral tribunals to provide reasoned decisions on interest rates and considered the conduct of parties in awarding interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=428494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>