<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 26 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30586</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai maintained the penalty of Rs. 100 per day under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, citing lack of power to reduce below the mandatory minimum. It upheld the reduced penalty of Rs. 5,000 under section 78, noting the lack of challenge to the service provider&#039;s intention. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to legal precedents and proper appellate procedures for challenging and modifying penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 07:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 26 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30586</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai maintained the penalty of Rs. 100 per day under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, citing lack of power to reduce below the mandatory minimum. It upheld the reduced penalty of Rs. 5,000 under section 78, noting the lack of challenge to the service provider&#039;s intention. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to legal precedents and proper appellate procedures for challenging and modifying penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>