https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304544 The court dismissed the petition, upholding the validity of the detention order based on the petitioner's criminal history and ongoing illegal activities. The court found that the detaining authority had adhered to constitutional safeguards, including informing the petitioner of his rights and considering relevant factors before issuing the order. The detention was confirmed for one year, and procedural requirements, such as communication with the Central Government, were met. The court concluded that the detention was lawful under Article 22(5) of the Constitution. en-us Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 02 Oct 2022 19:01:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304544 The court dismissed the petition, upholding the validity of the detention order based on the petitioner's criminal history and ongoing illegal activities. The court found that the detaining authority had adhered to constitutional safeguards, including informing the petitioner of his rights and considering relevant factors before issuing the order. The detention was confirmed for one year, and procedural requirements, such as communication with the Central Government, were met. The court concluded that the detention was lawful under Article 22(5) of the Constitution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304544